Skip to main content
  1. Posts/

JPEG Image Quality in PIL

··298 words·2 mins·
Table of Contents


The other day, I was haunted by a bug and found that it was an issue with the image quality saved by Pillow after spending a few hours debugging the code.

Initially, the workflow of my code was like loading the JPEG image with PIL and after some operation, saving the image again. But I didn’t give any other parameters except the file name when using method.

The quality parameter

After looking up the documentation, I find that PIL will save the image with quality factor 75 by default so that the image quality is decreased. The documentation for quality says:

The image quality, on a scale from 1 (worst) to 95 (best). The default is 75. Values above 95 should be avoided; 100 disables portions of the JPEG compression algorithm, and results in large files with hardly any gain in image quality.

Using a quality factor of 95 should be enough to preserve the image quality:'test.jpg', quality=95)


According to this post, even if you use quality=100, the saved image will still be slightly different from the original image. This is because PIL will also use subsampling technique to reduce the image size. You can use subsampling=0 to turn off this feature. Overall, to retain the content of original image, you may use:'test.jpg', quality=100, subsampling=0)

Other options for quality

For JPEG files, there are also a list of preset options you can use for the quality parameter, such web_high, high. The complete list of options can be found here. These preset options will set the subsampling factor and quantization table which is used in image quantization process.



Convert PIL or OpenCV Image to Bytes without Saving to Disk
··409 words·2 mins
How to Add Color Emoji to Image in Python
··673 words·4 mins
Create Outline Text in Python with Pillow
··211 words·1 min